[openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

Balaji.P at freescale.com Balaji.P at freescale.com
Mon Aug 18 03:49:19 UTC 2014


Hi Edgar,

Freescale CI is not listed in the below report:

https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Existing_Pl

We are following all the requirements of CI setup and as well participating in the IRC Meeting. Can you please let us know if we are missing any other requirements of CI Setup.

Regards,
Balaji.P



> -----Original Message-----
> From: trinath.somanchi at freescale.com
> [mailto:trinath.somanchi at freescale.com]
> Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 12:04 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
> required to be run
> 
> Hi Edgar,
> 
> Freescale CI is reporting the results for ML2 Mechanism driver (J-1) and
> FWaaS Plugin (to be approved for J-3).
> I'm the owner for this CI.
> 
> The Wiki page for this CI is
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/Freescale_CI.
> 
> --
> Trinath Somanchi - B39208
> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 4:06 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
> required to be run
> Importance: High
> 
> Team,
> 
> I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few plugins
> and drivers are running properly and testing all Neutron commits.
> I created a report here:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Existing_Plug
> in
> _and_Drivers
> 
> 
> We will discuss the actions to take on the next Neutron IRC meeting. So
> please, reach me out to clarify what is the status of your CI.
> I had two commits to quickly verify the CI reliability:
> 
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/
> 
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40296/
> 
> 
> I would expect all plugins and drivers passing on the first one and
> failing for the second but I got so many surprises.
> 
> Neutron code quality and reliability is a top priority, if you ignore
> this report that plugin/driver will be candidate to be remove from
> Neutron tree.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Edgar
> 
> P.s. I hate to be the inquisitor hereŠ but someone has to do the dirty
> job!
> 
> 
> On 8/14/14, 8:30 AM, "Kyle Mestery" <mestery at mestery.com> wrote:
> 
> >Folks, I'm not sure if all CI accounts are running sufficient tests.
> >Per the requirements wiki page here [1], everyone needs to be running
> >more than just Tempest API tests, which I still see most neutron
> >third-party CI setups doing. I'd like to ask everyone who operates a
> >third-party CI account for Neutron to please look at the link below and
> >make sure you are running appropriate tests. If you have questions, the
> >weekly third-party meeting [2] is a great place to ask questions.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Kyle
> >
> >[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting
> >[2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list