[openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

Ignacio Scopetta ignacio at embrane.com
Sat Aug 16 01:15:27 UTC 2014


Hi Edgar,
I am the reference for the Embrane CI (added my name to the page you linked)

Our Ci had some issues that were pointed out during  a third party meeting some weeks ago,
we solved the issues that were reported and the CI was running fine.

There was a list of issues tracked on this etherpad for various CIs
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-thirdparty-juno

Right now it's only running against changes to the plugin until this review gets finalized and merged:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108226/

Ignacio

-----Original Message-----
From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 3:59 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run
Importance: High

Correction

The right links are:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114629/

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/


Not this one:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40296/


Edgar

On 8/15/14, 3:35 PM, "Edgar Magana" <edgar.magana at workday.com> wrote:

>Team,
>
>I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few 
>plugins and drivers are running properly and testing all Neutron commits.
>I created a report here:
>https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Existing_Pl
>ugi
>n
>_and_Drivers
>
>
>We will discuss the actions to take on the next Neutron IRC meeting. So 
>please, reach me out to clarify what is the status of your CI.
>I had two commits to quickly verify the CI reliability:
>
>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/
>
>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40296/
>
>
>I would expect all plugins and drivers passing on the first one and 
>failing for the second but I got so many surprises.
>
>Neutron code quality and reliability is a top priority, if you ignore 
>this report that plugin/driver will be candidate to be remove from 
>Neutron tree.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Edgar
>
>P.s. I hate to be the inquisitor hereŠ but someone has to do the dirty 
>job!
>
>
>On 8/14/14, 8:30 AM, "Kyle Mestery" <mestery at mestery.com> wrote:
>
>>Folks, I'm not sure if all CI accounts are running sufficient tests.
>>Per the requirements wiki page here [1], everyone needs to be running 
>>more than just Tempest API tests, which I still see most neutron 
>>third-party CI setups doing. I'd like to ask everyone who operates a 
>>third-party CI account for Neutron to please look at the link below 
>>and make sure you are running appropriate tests. If you have 
>>questions, the weekly third-party meeting [2] is a great place to ask 
>>questions.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Kyle
>>
>>[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting
>>[2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list