Open Stack

On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:11:51 AM Kevin Benton wrote:
> Is the pylint static analysis that caught that error prone to false
> positives? If not, I agree that it would be really nice if that were made
> part of the tox check so these don't have to be fixed after the fact.

At the moment pylint on neutron is *very* noisy, and I've been looking through 
the reported issues by hand to get a feel for what's involved.  Enabling 
pylint is a separate discussion that I'd like to have - in some other thread.

-- 
 - Gus