[openstack-dev] [nova] Retrospective veto revert policy
mikal at stillhq.com
Wed Aug 13 01:29:38 UTC 2014
Actually, thinking on this more -- the lack of consensus is on the
attempt to re-add the patch, so I guess we'd handle that just like we
do for a contentious patch now.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 7:03 AM, Michael Still <mikal at stillhq.com> wrote:
> This looks reasonable to me, with a slight concern that I don't know
> what step five looks like... What if we can never reach a consensus on
> an issue?
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com> wrote:
>> (Terrible name for a policy, I know)
>> From the version_cap saga here:
>> I think we need a better understanding of how to approach situations
>> like this.
>> Here's my attempt at documenting what I think we're expecting the
>> procedure to be:
>> If it sounds reasonably sane, I can propose its addition to the
>> "Development policies" doc.
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> Rackspace Australia
More information about the OpenStack-dev