On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote: > On 08/12/2014 10:56 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > >> Hey >> >> (Terrible name for a policy, I know) >> >> From the version_cap saga here: >> >> https://review.openstack.org/110754 >> >> I think we need a better understanding of how to approach situations >> like this. >> >> Here's my attempt at documenting what I think we're expecting the >> procedure to be: >> >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-retrospective-veto-revert-policy >> >> If it sounds reasonably sane, I can propose its addition to the >> "Development policies" doc. >> > > Eminently reasonable. +1 +1 > > > -jay > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140812/64f46642/attachment.html>