Open Stack

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Eoghan Glynn <eglynn at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> > Ignoring the question of is it ok to say: 'to run ceilometer in any sort
> of
> > non-trivial deployment you must manager yet another underlying service,
> > mongodb' I would prefer not adding an addition gate variant to all
> projects.
> > With the effort to reduce the number of gate variants we have [0] I would
> > prefer to see just ceilometer gate on both mongodb and sqlalchemy and the
> > main integrated gate [1] pick just one.
>
> Just checking to see that I fully understand what you mean there, Joe.
>
> So would we:
>
>  (a) add a new integrated-gate-ceilometer project-template to [1],
>      in the style of integrated-gate-neutron or integrated-gate-sahara,
>      which would replicate the main integrated-gate template but with
>      the addition of gate-tempest-dsvm-ceilometer-mongodb(-full)
>
> or:
>
>  (b) simply move gate-tempest-dsvm-ceilometer-mongodb(-full) from
>      the experimental column[2] in the openstack-ceilometer project,
>      to the gate column on that project
>
> or:
>
>  (c) something else
>
> Please excuse the ignorance of gate mechanics inherent in that question.
>


Correct, AFAIK (a) or (b) would be sufficient.

There is another option, which is make the mongodb version the default in
integrated-gate and only run SQLA on ceilometer.



>
> Cheers,
> Eoghan
>
>
> [1]
> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/config/tree/modules/openstack_project/files/zuul/layout.yaml#n238
> [2]
> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/config/tree/modules/openstack_project/files/zuul/layout.yaml#n801
>
>
> > [0]
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-July/041057.html
> > [1]
> >
> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/config/tree/modules/openstack_project/files/zuul/layout.yaml#n238
> >
> >
> >
> > Does that work for you Devananda?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Eoghan
> >
> > > -Deva
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/TechnicalCommittee/Ceilometer_Gap_Coverage
> > >
> > > [2]
> > >
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/030510.html
> > > is a very articulate example of this objection
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140811/eaa7466c/attachment.html>