Open Stack

Ryan,

COPS implies a common protocol to communicate with PEPs, which implies the same communication mechanism basically.
So, you are implying that "endpoints" in GBP will use "different" protocol to communicate with "decisions" entities?

It that is the case.. Well it sounds very complex for a simple GBP initial project. Then, the discussion will be in a different level.

Edgar

From: Ryan Moats <rmoats at us.ibm.com<mailto:rmoats at us.ibm.com>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 2:18 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming


Edgar-

I can't speak for anyone else, but in my mind at least (and having been involved in the work that led up to 3198),
the members of the groups being discussed here are not PEPs.   As 3198 states, being a PEP implies running COPS
and I don't see that as necessary for membership in GBP groups.

Ryan Moats

Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com<mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>> wrote on 08/07/2014 04:02:43 PM:

> From: Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com<mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
> Date: 08/07/2014 04:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming
>
> I am sorry that I could not attend the GBP meeting.
> Is there any reason why the IEFT standard is not considered?
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3198
>
> I would like to understand the argument why we are creating new
> names instead of using the standard ones.
>
> Edgar
>
> From: Ronak Shah <ronak.malav.shah at gmail.com<mailto:ronak.malav.shah at gmail.com>>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
> Date: Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 1:17 PM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming
>
> Hi,
> Following a very interesting and vocal thread on GBP for last couple
> of days and the GBP meeting today, GBP sub-team proposes following
> name changes to the resource.
>

> policy-point for endpoint
> policy-group for endpointgroup (epg)
>
> Please reply if you feel that it is not ok with reason and suggestion.
>
> I hope that it wont be another 150 messages thread :)
>
> Ronak_______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140807/7803028f/attachment.html>