Open Stack

That is the beauty of the open source projects, there is always a smartest
reviewer catching out the facts that you don¹t.

Edgar

On 8/6/14, 10:55 AM, "Sumit Naiksatam" <sumitnaiksatam at gmail.com> wrote:

>Edgar, you seemed to have +2'ed this patch on July 2nd [1]:
>
>"
>Edgar Magana
>Jul 2 8:42 AM
>
>Patch Set 13: Code-Review+2
>
>All looks good to me! I am not approving yet because Nachi was also
>reviewing this code and I would like to see his opinion as well.
>"
>
>That would suggest that you were happy with what was in it. I don't
>see anything in the review comments that suggests otherwise.
>
>[1]  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/95900/
>
>On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com>
>wrote:
>> This is the consequence of a proposal that is not following the
>>standardized
>> terminology (IETF - RFC) for any Policy-based System:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3198
>>
>> Well, I did bring  this point during the Hong Kong Summit but as you
>>can see
>> my comments were totally ignored:
>> 
>>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZbOFxAoibZbJmDWx1oOrOsDcov6Cuom5aaBIr
>>upCD9E/edit
>>
>> I clearly saw this kind of issues coming. Let me quote myself what I
>> suggested: "For instance: "endpoints" should be "enforcement point"
>>
>> I do not understand why GBP did not include this suggestionŠ
>>
>> Edgar
>>
>> From: Kevin Benton <blak111 at gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 at 10:22 AM
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way
>> forward
>>
>> What I was referring to was also not Keystone's definition of an
>>endpoint.
>> It's almost as if the term has many uses and was not invented for
>>Keystone.
>> :-)
>>
>> http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/ChStatEndpoints.html
>>
>> Did a similar discussion occur when Heat wanted to use the word
>>'template'
>> since this was clearly already in use by Horizon?
>>
>> On Aug 6, 2014 9:24 AM, "Jay Pipes" <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/06/2014 02:12 AM, Kevin Benton wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Given that, pointing to the Nova parity work seems a bit like a red
>>>> herring. This new API is being developed orthogonally to the existing
>>>> API endpoints
>>>
>>>
>>> You see how you used the term endpoints there? :P
>>>
>>> -jay
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev