Open Stack

Salvatore,

Can you expand on point 2? Not sure what means in this case to 'treat it
accordingly'.

Thanks,
Ivar.


On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Salvatore Orlando <sorlando at nicira.com>
wrote:

> As Ronak said, this thread is starting to move in a lot of different
> directions, ranging from correctness of the blueprint approval process to
> nova/neutron integration, which are rather off topic.
>
> In particular it seems things are being skewed towards a discussion around
> nova parity, whereas actually some people have just chimed in with their
> honest opinion that with all the stuff still needed to finally be able to
> make neutron "THE" openstack networking solution, the effort towards adding
> a new tenant facing API appears to have a lesser priority.
>
> I just want to reassure everybody that the majority of the core team and a
> large part of the community have actually made this their first priority.
> For what is worth, some of them have even delayed plugin/driver specific
> development to this aim.
>
> So I would invite to go back to the original subject of the discussion,
> that is to say decide as a community what would the best way forward for
> this effort.
> I see so far the following options:
> - merge the outstanding patches, assuming there are no further technical
> concerns, and include GBP in Juno.
> - consider GBP an 'experimental' V3 tenant API (this was mentioned
> somewhere in this thread) and treat it accordingly
> - delay to the next release
> - move the development of the service plugin to stackforge as suggested to
> this thread.
>
> More options are obviously welcome!
>
> Regards,
> Salvatore
>
>
> On 6 August 2014 19:40, Ivar Lazzaro <ivarlazzaro at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Which kind of uncertainty are you referring to?
>>
>> Given that the blueprint was approved long ago, and the code has been
>> ready and under review following those specs... I think GBP is probably the
>> patch with the least effort to be merged right now.
>>
>> Ivar.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Joe Gordon <joe.gordon0 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 6, 2014 10:21 AM, "Ronak Shah" <ronak.malav.shah at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > We have diverged our attention towards nova-network-> neutron parity
>>> on this thread unnecessarily.
>>> >
>>> > Can we discuss and collectively decide on what is the way forward for
>>> GBP in Juno release?
>>> >
>>> > Efforts have been made by the subteam starting from throwing PoC at
>>> last summit to spec approval to code review.
>>> >
>>> > There are usefulness to this feature and I think everyone is on the
>>> same page there.
>>> >
>>> > Let us not discourage the effort by bringing in existing neutron issue
>>> in play.
>>>
>>> > Yes, we has a neutorn community needs to fix that with highest
>>> priority.
>>> > But this is orthogonal effort.
>>>
>>> The efforts may be orthogonal, but the review team and bandwidth of said
>>> team is one and the same. Making nova-network the highest priority means
>>> pushing other blueprints back as needed.  And since there is still so much
>>> uncertainty around GPB this late in the cycle, IMHO it's a good candidate
>>> for getting deferred.
>>>
>>> > If endpoint is not a likeable preferred name than lets propose more
>>> meaningful alternative.
>>> > Let us try to find a middle ground on how this feature can be made
>>> generally available.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Ronak
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140806/17b30027/attachment.html>