Hello, yes, this is a very needed change, so I'd vote for -2 everything unless it's rebased to 105347. Thank you for the patches. Ladislav On 08/01/2014 02:19 AM, Steve Baker wrote: > The changes to port tripleo-heat-templates to HOT have been rebased to > the current state and are ready to review. They are the next steps in > blueprint tripleo-juno-remove-mergepy. > > However there is coordination needed to merge since every existing > tripleo-heat-templates change will need to be rebased and changed > after the port lands (lucky you!). > > Here is a summary of the important changes in the series: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105327/ > Low risk and plenty of +2s, just needs enough validation from CI for > an approve > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105328/ > Scripted conversion to HOT. Converts everything except Fn::Select > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105347/ > Manual conversion of Fn::Select to extended get_attr > > I'd like to suggest the following approach for getting these to land: > * Any changes which really should land before the above 3 get listed > in this mail thread (vlan?) > * Reviews of the above 3 changes, and local testing of change 105347 > * All other tripleo-heat-templates need to be rebased/reworked to be > after 105347 (and maybe -2 until they are?) > > I'm available for any questions on porting your changes to HOT. > > cheers > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140801/d3f4b1ee/attachment.html>