Open Stack

Hi Clint

Thank you for your suggestion. Your point get taken :)

> Kyle
This is also a same discussion for LBaaS
Can we discuss this in advanced service meeting?

> Zang
Could you join the discussion?



2014-04-29 15:48 GMT-07:00 Clint Byrum <clint at fewbar.com>:
> Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-04-29 10:58:53 -0700:
>> Hi Kyle
>>
>> 2014-04-29 10:52 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery <mestery at noironetworks.com>:
>> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno <nachi at ntti3.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi Zang
>> >>
>> >> Thank you for your contribution on this!
>> >> The private key management is what I want to discuss in the summit.
>> >>
>> > Has the idea of using Barbican been discussed before? There are many
>> > reasons why using Barbican for this may be better than developing key
>> > management ourselves.
>>
>> No, however I'm +1 for using Barbican. Let's discuss this in
>> certificate management topic in advanced service session.
>>
>
> Just a suggestion: Don't defer that until the summit. Sounds like you've
> already got some consensus, so you don't need the summit just to rubber
> stamp it. I suggest discussing as much as you can right now on the mailing
> list, and using the time at the summit to resolve any complicated issues
> including any "a or b" things that need crowd-sourced idea making. You
> can also use the summit time to communicate your requirements to the
> Barbican developers.
>
> Point is: just because you'll have face time, doesn't mean you should
> use it for what can be done via the mailing list.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev