Open Stack

According to this page [1], "update-device" is supported from libvirt
0.8.0 onwards. So in theory, this should be working with your 0.9.8
version you have. If you continue to hit issues here Oleg, I'd suggest
sending an email to the libvirt mailing list with the specifics of the
problem. I've found in the past there are lots of very helpful on that
mailing list.

Thanks,
Kyle

[1] http://libvirt.org/sources/virshcmdref/html-single/#sect-update-device

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Oleg Bondarev <obondarev at mirantis.com> wrote:
> So here is the etherpad for the migration discussion:
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/novanet-neutron-migration
> I've also filed a design session on this:
> http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/374
>
> Currently I'm still struggling with instance vNic update, trying to move it
> from one bridge to another.
> Tried the following on ubuntu 12.04 with libvirt 0.9.8:
> https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Virtualization_Administration_Guide/sect-dynamic-vNIC.html
> virsh update-device shows success but nothing actually changes in the
> instance interface config.
> Going to try this with later libvirt version.
>
> Thanks,
> Oleg
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Rossella Sblendido <rsblendido at suse.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Very interesting topic!
>> +1 Salvatore
>>
>> It would be nice to have an etherpad to share the information and organize
>> a plan. This way it would be easier for interested people  to join.
>>
>> Rossella
>>
>>
>> On 04/23/2014 12:57 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
>>
>> It's great to see that there is activity on the launchpad blueprint as
>> well.
>> From what I heard Oleg should have already translated the various
>> discussion into a list of functional requirements (or something like that).
>>
>> If that is correct, it might be a good idea to share them with relevant
>> stakeholders (operators and developers), define an actionable plan for Juno,
>> and then distribute tasks.
>> It would be a shame if it turns out several contributors are working on
>> this topic independently.
>>
>> Salvatore
>>
>>
>> On 22 April 2014 16:27, Jesse Pretorius <jesse.pretorius at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 22 April 2014 14:58, Salvatore Orlando <sorlando at nicira.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From previous requirements discussions,
>>>
>>>
>>> There's a track record of discussions on the whiteboard here:
>>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/nova-to-quantum-upgrade
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>