Open Stack

On Fri, Apr 25 2014, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:

> I am not sure tho that forking oslo.common.policy is any better than
> copy/pasting it with its dependences.

+1, forking is not an option.

> I would suggest we move `swift-keystoneauth` to its own project part of the
> swift umbrella projects to handle such things and be able to include those
> policy module directly.
>
> I think we have enough swift core now that uses keystone everyday to
> sponsors the core review for that project.

I like that plan. :)

-- 
Julien Danjou
-- Free Software hacker
-- http://julien.danjou.info
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140425/b49a5ff6/attachment.pgp>