Open Stack

Yeah, service type has internal meaning, I'd avoid using that term.
Network service type probably is a bit of tautology, because we only offer
network services :)

Eugene.


On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Alan Kavanagh
<alan.kavanagh at ericsson.com>wrote:

> Think that's a good idea Jay
> A slight twist perhaps: "Network Service Type"
>
> /Alan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypipes at gmail.com]
> Sent: April-23-14 11:29 AM
> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Flavor(?) Framework
>
> On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 19:24 +0400, Eugene Nikanorov wrote:
> > Thanks, that can be an option.
>
> > Just wondering, can we find a single name?
>
> service type? :)
>
> Oh, I guess that's taken. Well, we could always rename the existing
> service type to "service class" or "service family".
>
> Best,
> -jay
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140423/d7e41e9d/attachment.html>