Very interesting topic! +1 Salvatore It would be nice to have an etherpad to share the information and organize a plan. This way it would be easier for interested people to join. Rossella On 04/23/2014 12:57 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > It's great to see that there is activity on the launchpad blueprint as > well. > From what I heard Oleg should have already translated the various > discussion into a list of functional requirements (or something like > that). > > If that is correct, it might be a good idea to share them with > relevant stakeholders (operators and developers), define an actionable > plan for Juno, and then distribute tasks. > It would be a shame if it turns out several contributors are working > on this topic independently. > > Salvatore > > > On 22 April 2014 16:27, Jesse Pretorius <jesse.pretorius at gmail.com > <mailto:jesse.pretorius at gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 22 April 2014 14:58, Salvatore Orlando <sorlando at nicira.com > <mailto:sorlando at nicira.com>> wrote: > > From previous requirements discussions, > > > There's a track record of discussions on the whiteboard here: > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/nova-to-quantum-upgrade > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140423/a794914c/attachment.html>