Open Stack

On 04/22/2014 02:38 PM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
> When I initially spoke to the infra team regarding this problem, they
> suggested that "just fixing migrations" so that the job could run was
> not a real option.
> I tend to agree with this statement.
> However, I'm open to options for getting grenade going until the
> migration problem is solved. Ugly workarounds might be fine, as long as
> we won't be doing anything that a real deployer would never do.
> 
> Personally, I still think the best way for getting grenade to work is to
> ensure previos_rev and current_rev have the same configuration. For the
> havana/icehouse upgrade, this will mean that devstack for icehouse
> should not add the metering plugin.

Is it possible to run Icehouse tempest without metering tests?

Kuba

> I and Jakub are overdue a discussion
> on whether this would be feasible or not.
> 
> Change 87935 is acceptable as a fix for that specific migration.
> However it does not fix the general issue, where the root cause is that
> currently the state of the neutron database depends on configuration
> settings, and therefore migrations are idempotent as long as the plugin
> configuration is not changed, which is not the case.
> 
> Salvatore
> 
> 
> On 22 April 2014 11:14, Jakub Libosvar <libosvar at redhat.com
> <mailto:libosvar at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 04/22/2014 10:53 AM, Anna Kamyshnikova wrote:
>     > Hello everyone!
>     >
>     > I'm working on fixing bug 1307344. I found out solution that will fix
>     > Grenade jobs and will work for online and offline migartions.
>     > https://review.openstack.org/87935 But I faced the problem that
>     Metering
>     > usage won't be fixed as we need to create 2 tables (meteringlabels,
>     > meteringlabelrules). I tried to create both in patch set #7 but it
>     won't
>     > work for offline migration. In fact to fix Grenade it is enough to
>     > create meteringlabels table, that is done in my change in the last
>     patch
>     > set #8. I want to ask reviewers to take a look at this change and
>     > suggest something or approve it. I'm available on
>     IRC(akamyshnikova) or
>     > by email.
>     >
>     > Regards
>     > Ann
>     Hi Ann,
> 
>     Good suggestion how to get out of failing job but I don't think it
>     should go to 33c3db036fe4_set_length_of_description_field_metering.py
>     because this failure is grenade specific while the real issue is a fact
>     that we're not able to add new service plugin to already deployed
>     Neutron.
> 
>     I think the same workaround you proposed in the 87935 review should go
>     to grenade itself (from-havana/upgrade-neutron script) just to have the
>     job working on havana->icehouse upgrade. It's a bit of ugly workaround
>     though but imho so far the best solution to reach stable job in a short
>     time.
> 
>     Kuba
> 
>     >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>     > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>     > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>     >
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     OpenStack-dev mailing list
>     OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>