[openstack-dev] [neutron] Updates to the template for Neutron BPs
Mike Scherbakov
mscherbakov at mirantis.com
Sat Apr 19 22:11:47 UTC 2014
Hi Kyle,
I built template and it looks awesome. We are considering to use same
approach for Fuel.
My assumption is that spec will be on review for a negotiation time, which
is going to be quite a while. In my opinion, it is not always very
convenient to read spec in gerrit.
Did you guys have any thoughts on auto-build these specs into html on every
patch upload? So we could go somewhere and see built results, without a
requirement to fetch neutron-specs, and run tox? The possible drawback is
that reader won't see gerrit comments..
Thanks,
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Kyle Mestery <mestery at noironetworks.com>wrote:
> Hi folks:
>
> I just wanted to let people know that we've merged a few patches [1]
> to the neutron-specs repository over the past week which have updated
> the template.rst file. Specifically, Nachi has provided some
> instructions for using Sphinx diagram tools in lieu of asciiflow.com.
> Either approach is fine for any Neutron BP submissions, but Nachi's
> patch has some examples of using both approaches. Bob merged a patch
> which shows an example of defining REST APIs with attribute tables.
>
> Just an update for anyone proposing BPs for Juno at the moment.
>
> Thanks!
> Kyle
>
> [1]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:merged+project:openstack/neutron-specs,n,z
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Mike Scherbakov
#mihgen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140420/8391eeff/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list