On 15/04/14 21:54, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 04/15/2014 01:44 PM, Robert Collins wrote: >> I've been watching the nova process, and I think its working out well >> - it certainly addresses: >> - making design work visible >> - being able to tell who has had input >> - and providing clear feedback to the designers >> >> I'd like to do the same thing for TripleO this cycle.. >> >> I'm thinking we can just add docs to incubator, since thats already a >> repository separate to our production code - what do folk think? >> >> -Rob >> > > +1 from me. We've also been planning to adopt this for Oslo. > > For anyone who hasn't been following the Nova discussion, here's a link > to the original proposal: > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/029232.html thanks Ben, this was useful to understand what was being proposed here. +1 from me fwiw and I also agree with others that it will be cleaner to have a stand-alone specs repo, thanks, marios > > There's also the more recent thread Monty referenced: > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-April/032753.html > > -Ben > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev