Open Stack

Hey

Co-locating still has the option to partially overlap the two sprints.

Cheers,
--
Chris Jones

> On 16 Apr 2014, at 02:38, Michael Still <mikal at stillhq.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Robert Collins
> <robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:
>> On 16 April 2014 11:28, Michael Still <mikal at stillhq.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Hugh O. Brock <hbrock at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 09:30:45AM +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> Redhat offered to host the next TripleO midcycle meetup in Raleigh, I
>>>>> don't know if they have space for Nova & TripleO at once, but I'd love
>>>>> to get more collaboration time betwixt Nova and TripleO. The TripleO
>>>>> midcycle meetups are 'doing' meetings, not planning meetings - but
>>>>> plenty of planning does still happen ;)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Date wise, how about before OSCON ? PyConAU which often gets a heavy
>>>>> openstack contingent is august 1-5.
>>>> 
>>>> I am sure we have enough space, we would be very happy to host both at
>>>> the same time.
>>> 
>>> I envision "at the same time" being "back to back" to be honest, as I
>>> think running two in parallel would be a bit bonkers.
>> 
>> I can't travel for a single 2 week trip - my daughter doesn't cope
>> super well with me being gone, and I don't want to subject her to a 2
>> week trip. Doing a 2-or-3 day meetup for TripleO is pointless IMO -
>> folk spend a day getting there in the first place.
>> 
>> Last cycle TripleO and Ironic co-located and it was productive for all involved.
> 
> This may mean that co-locating is an idea which doesn't work out.
> 
> Based on the way the last nova meetup went, there will be little time
> to dig into the deeper specifics of tripleo (ironic especially) if its
> in time that's also allocated to other nova discussion -- I think the
> absolute longest we spent on a single topic last time was in the order
> of a couple of hours. The nova meetup also wasn't a hackfest -- it was
> more about design review and progress tracking, and I think that was a
> model that worked well for us.
> 
> I see a need for a lot of sync between ironic and nova for Juno,
> mostly around the replacement of the baremetal driver. Perhaps instead
> we should go back to trying to have these events separately, and try
> and get a few key nova people to the the tripleo meetup.
> 
> Michael
> 
> -- 
> Rackspace Australia
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev