[openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling

Jay Lau jay.lau.513 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 10 14:19:44 UTC 2014


Hi Shane,

IBM PRS is not open source, its an add on product for OpenStack.

For your framework, ceilometer can only report some VM metrics, how did you
do the resource optimization based on only vm metrics?

Thanks.


2014-04-10 14:57 GMT+08:00 Wang, Shane <shane.wang at intel.com>:

>  Ditto, I am also interested in that area. We're implementing a framework
> to monitor different metrics from Ceilometer, apply predefined policies
> from administrators, and take actions if some conditions are met for
> resource optimization purpose or SLA purpose.
>
>
>
> Jay, is IBM PRS open source?
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
>
> Shane
>
> *From:* Susanne Balle [mailto:sleipnir012 at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 10, 2014 12:57 AM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling
>
>
>
> Ditto. I am interested in contributing as well.
>
>
>
> Does Gant work with Devstack? I am assuming the link will give me
> directions on how to test it and contribute to the project.
>
>
>
> Susanne
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Henrique Truta <
> henriquecostatruta at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> @Oleg, @Sylvain, @Leandro, Thanls. I'll check the Gantt project and the
> blueprint
>
>
>
> 2014-04-09 12:59 GMT-03:00 Sylvain Bauza <sylvain.bauza at gmail.com>:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2014-04-09 17:47 GMT+02:00 Jay Lau <jay.lau.513 at gmail.com>:
>
>
>
> @Oleg, Till now, I'm not sure the target of Gantt, is it for initial
> placement policy or run time policy or both, can you help clarify?
>
>
>
> I don't want to talk on behalf of Oleg, but Gantt is targeted to be the
> forklift of the current Nova scheduler. So, a placement decision based on
> dynamic metrics would be worth it.
>
> That said, as Gantt is not targeted to be delivered until Juno at least
> (with Nova sched deprecated), I think any progress on a BP should target
> Nova with respect to the forklift efforts, so it would automatically be
> ported to Gantt once the actual fork would happen.
>
>
>
> -Sylvain
>
>
>
>  Jay
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> --
> Ítalo Henrique Costa Truta
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Thanks,

Jay
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140410/d414d28d/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list