Open Stack

On 04/09/2014 10:45 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 10 April 2014 02:32, Chris Friesen <chris.friesen at windriver.com> wrote:
>> On 04/09/2014 03:45 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Russell Bryant
>>
>>
>>>> We were thinking that there may be a use for being able to query a
>>>> full list of instances (including the deleted ones) for a group.
>>>> The API just hasn't made it that far yet.  Just hiding them for now
>>>> leaves room to iterate and doesn't prevent either option (exposing
>>>> the deleted instances, or changing to auto- delete them from the
>>>> group).
>>
>>
>>> Maybe it's just me, but I have a natural aversion to anything that
>>> grows forever in the database - over time and at scale this becomes a
>>> real problem.
>>
>>
>> Not just you.  I want my main database to reflect the current active data.
>> Historical data should go somewhere else.
> 
> +1. Fastest way to make an OLTP workload crawl is to mix it up with warehousing.

I do not disagree.

-- 
Russell Bryant