Open Stack

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014, at 12:30 PM, Jay Dobies wrote:
> On 04/07/2014 07:50 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> > tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
> > bnemec
> > greghaynes
> > jdon
> 
> I'm comfortable with committing to at least 3 reviews a day and promise 
> to wield the awesome power of +2 responsibly. I appreciate being 
> nominated :)
> 

I am also comfortable with performing at least 3 reviews daily and would
only 
use my new found powers responsibly. Thanks!

> >
> > On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones <cmsj at tenshu.net> wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> +1 for your proposed -core changes.
> >>
> >> Re your question about whether we should retroactively apply the 3-a-day
> >> rule to the 3 month review stats, my suggestion would be a qualified no.
> >>
> >> I think we've established an agile approach to the member list of -core, so
> >> if there are a one or two people who we would have added to -core before the
> >> goalposts moved, I'd say look at their review quality. If they're showing
> >> the right stuff, let's get them in and helping. If they don't feel our new
> >> goalposts are achievable with their workload, they'll fall out again
> >> naturally before long.
> >
> > So I've actioned the prior vote.
> >
> > I said: "Bnemec, jdob, greg etc - good stuff, I value your reviews
> > already, but..."
> >
> > So... looking at a few things - long period of reviews:
> > 60 days:
> > |        greghaynes       |     121    0  22  99   0   0    81.8% |
> > 14 ( 11.6%)  |
> > |          bnemec         |     116    0  38  78   0   0    67.2% |
> > 10 (  8.6%)  |
> > |           jdob          |      87    0  15  72   0   0    82.8% |
> > 4 (  4.6%)  |
> >
> > 90 days:
> >
> > |          bnemec         |     145    0  40 105   0   0    72.4% |
> > 17 ( 11.7%)  |
> > |        greghaynes       |     142    0  23 119   0   0    83.8% |
> > 22 ( 15.5%)  |
> > |           jdob          |     106    0  17  89   0   0    84.0% |
> > 7 (  6.6%)  |
> >
> > Ben's reviews are thorough, he reviews across all contributors, he
> > shows good depth of knowledge and awareness across tripleo, and is
> > sensitive to the pragmatic balance between 'right' and 'good enough'.
> > I'm delighted to support him for core now.
> >
> > Greg is very active, reviewing across all contributors with pretty
> > good knowledge and awareness. I'd like to see a little more contextual
> > awareness though - theres a few (but not many) reviews where looking
> > at how the big picture of things fitting together more would have been
> > beneficial. *however*, I think that's a room-to-improve issue vs
> > not-good-enough-for-core - to me it makes sense to propose him for
> > core too.
> >
> > Jay's reviews are also very good and consistent, somewhere between
> > Greg and Ben in terms of bigger-context awareness - so another
> > definite +1 from me.
> >
> > -Rob
> >
> >
> >
> >