Open Stack

Xuhan, Sean and others.

As stated in the commit message and bug, this is a temporary measure to
avoid making ra_mode and ipv6_address_mode consumable in the icehouse
release.
I made this move because https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70649/ did not
land in Icehouse, and that was needed to make those two attributes
functional, in my opinion.

I probably won't be able to attend tomorrow's meeting.
However, if you are looking for a solution where one could decide to
leverage anyway those attributes tweaking a few configuration, that might
be possible using the policy engine, even if I dislike this approach.

Salvatore


On 8 April 2014 08:23, Xuhan Peng <pengxuhan at gmail.com> wrote:

> Sean,
>
> I've added Salvatore's code review of "Hide ipv6 subnet API attributes" to
> our discussion list.
>
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/85869/
>
> Xuhan
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 4:49 AM, Collins, Sean <
> Sean_Collins2 at cable.comcast.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've added a section for tomorrow's agenda, please do add topics that
>> you'd like to discuss.
>>
>>
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-IPv6-Subteam#Agenda_for_April_8th
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sean M. Collins
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140408/fc60a2f4/attachment.html>