Open Stack

On Tue, Apr 08 2014, Doug Hellmann wrote:

> I would like for us to continue to use the oslo prefix in some cases,
> because it makes naming simple libraries easier but more importantly
> because it is an indicator that we intend those libraries to be much
> more useful to OpenStack projects than to anyone else. For projects
> where that isn't the case (cliff, stevedore, taskflow, tooz, etc.) we
> are already choosing "non-branded" names.

I understand that, but can you point really a function that is
so-damn-OpenStack-specific that if somebody would stumble upon it it
would be like "pffff, what the hell!"? I don't think so. :)

-- 
Julien Danjou
// Free Software hacker
// http://julien.danjou.info
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140408/0794ab12/attachment.pgp>