Open Stack

On 2014/08/04 01:50, Robert Collins wrote:
> tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
> bnemec
> greghaynes
> jdon

jdon -> jdob

+1 for all the folks.

-- Jarda

>
> On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones <cmsj at tenshu.net> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> +1 for your proposed -core changes.
>>
>> Re your question about whether we should retroactively apply the 3-a-day
>> rule to the 3 month review stats, my suggestion would be a qualified no.
>>
>> I think we've established an agile approach to the member list of -core, so
>> if there are a one or two people who we would have added to -core before the
>> goalposts moved, I'd say look at their review quality. If they're showing
>> the right stuff, let's get them in and helping. If they don't feel our new
>> goalposts are achievable with their workload, they'll fall out again
>> naturally before long.
>
> So I've actioned the prior vote.
>
> I said: "Bnemec, jdob, greg etc - good stuff, I value your reviews
> already, but..."
>
> So... looking at a few things - long period of reviews:
> 60 days:
> |        greghaynes       |     121    0  22  99   0   0    81.8% |
> 14 ( 11.6%)  |
> |          bnemec         |     116    0  38  78   0   0    67.2% |
> 10 (  8.6%)  |
> |           jdob          |      87    0  15  72   0   0    82.8% |
> 4 (  4.6%)  |
>
> 90 days:
>
> |          bnemec         |     145    0  40 105   0   0    72.4% |
> 17 ( 11.7%)  |
> |        greghaynes       |     142    0  23 119   0   0    83.8% |
> 22 ( 15.5%)  |
> |           jdob          |     106    0  17  89   0   0    84.0% |
> 7 (  6.6%)  |
>
> Ben's reviews are thorough, he reviews across all contributors, he
> shows good depth of knowledge and awareness across tripleo, and is
> sensitive to the pragmatic balance between 'right' and 'good enough'.
> I'm delighted to support him for core now.
>
> Greg is very active, reviewing across all contributors with pretty
> good knowledge and awareness. I'd like to see a little more contextual
> awareness though - theres a few (but not many) reviews where looking
> at how the big picture of things fitting together more would have been
> beneficial. *however*, I think that's a room-to-improve issue vs
> not-good-enough-for-core - to me it makes sense to propose him for
> core too.
>
> Jay's reviews are also very good and consistent, somewhere between
> Greg and Ben in terms of bigger-context awareness - so another
> definite +1 from me.
>
> -Rob