Open Stack

On Mon, Apr 07 2014, Doug Hellmann wrote:

> We can avoid adding to the problem by putting each new library in its
> own package. We still want the Oslo name attached for libraries that
> are really only meant to be used by OpenStack projects, and so we need
> a naming convention. I'm not entirely happy with the "crammed
> together" approach for oslotest and oslosphinx. At one point Dims and
> I talked about using a prefix "oslo_" instead of just "oslo", so we
> would have "oslo_db", "oslo_i18n", etc. That's also a bit ugly,
> though. Opinions?

Honestly, I think it'd be better to not have oslo at all and use
independent – if possible explicit – names for everything

-- 
Julien Danjou
# Free Software hacker
# http://julien.danjou.info
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140408/c7bbed50/attachment.pgp>