Open Stack

If the timing works, that seems fine :)

Regards,


Tom

On 07/04/14 10:32, Michael Still wrote:
> It might be that this is happening because there is no clear incumbent
> for the Nova PTL position. Is it ok to hold off on this until after
> the outcome of the election is known?
>
> Michael
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org> wrote:
>> So far, there's been no comment from anyone working on nova, so there's been
>> no session proposed.
>>
>> I can, of course, propose a session ... but without buy-in from the project
>> team it's unlikely to be accepted.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>
>> On 01/04/14 22:44, Matt Van Winkle wrote:
>>>
>>> So, I've been watching the etherpad and the summit submissions and I
>>> noticed that there isn't anything for nova.  Maybe I'm off base, but it
>>> seems like we'd be missing the mark to not have a Developer/Operator's
>>> exchange on the key product.  Is there anything we can do to get a session
>>> slotted like these other products?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> On 3/28/14 2:01 AM, "Tom Fifield" <tom at openstack.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks to those projects that responded. I've proposed sessions in
>>>> swift, ceilometer, tripleO and horizon.
>>>>
>>>> On 17/03/14 07:54, Tom Fifield wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> All,
>>>>>
>>>>> Many times we've heard a desire for more feedback and interaction from
>>>>> users. However, their attendance at design summit sessions is met with
>>>>> varied success.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, last summit, by happy accident, a swift session turned into a
>>>>> something a lot more user driven. A competent user was able to describe
>>>>> their use case, and the developers were able to stage a number of
>>>>> question to them. In this way, some of the assumptions about the way
>>>>> certain things were implemented, and the various priorities of future
>>>>> plans became clearer. It worked really well ... perhaps this is
>>>>> something we'd like to have happen for all the projects?
>>>>>
>>>>> *Idea*: Add an "ops" session for each project in the design summit
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ATL-ops-dedicated-design-summit-sessions
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Most operators running OpenStack tend to treat it more holistically than
>>>>> those coding it. They are aware of, but don't necessarily think or work
>>>>> in terms of project  breakdowns. To this end, I'd imagine the such
>>>>> sessions would:
>>>>>
>>>>>     * have a primary purpose for developers to ask the operators to
>>>>> answer
>>>>>       questions, and request information
>>>>>
>>>>>     * allow operators to tell the developers things (give feedback) as a
>>>>>       secondary purpose that could potentially be covered better in a
>>>>>       cross-project session
>>>>>
>>>>>     * need good moderation, for example to push operator-to-operator
>>>>>       discussion into forums with more time available (eg
>>>>>       https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ATL-ops-unconference-RFC )
>>>>>
>>>>>     * be reinforced by having volunteer "good" users in potentially every
>>>>>       design summit session
>>>>>       (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ATL-ops-in-design-sessions )
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, just a strawman - please jump on the etherpad
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ATL-ops-dedicated-design-summit-session
>>>>> s)
>>>>> or leave your replies here!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>