Open Stack

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Flavio Percoco <flavio at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 23/09/13 15:21 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
>> The policy code seems very tightly associated with the keystone work.
>> There's
>> no reason for Oslo to be the only program releasing reusable libraries. We
>> should consider having the Keystone team manage the policy library in a
>> repo
>> they own. I'd love to have the Keystone middleware work the same way,
>> instead
>> of being in the client repo, but one step at a time.
>>
>> Of course, if the policy code is nearing the point where it is ready to
>> graduate from the incubator, then maybe that suggestion is moot and we
>> should
>> just continue to push ahead on the path we're on now. We could have people
>> submitting policy code to oslo-incubator add "keystone-core" to reviews
>> (adding
>> a group automatically adds its members), so they don't have to subscribe
>> to
>> oslo notifications.
>>
>> How close is the policy code to being ready to graduate?
>>
>>
> After the last huge re-factor, I think the policy code is mature
> enough to live in its own repo. There are some other features I think
> it should support - like other persistence backends - but I guess that
> can be addressed when it's in a separate repo.
>
> As a graduation requirement, I'd like to see other projects being
> migrated to the latest code - cinder, glance, nova - as a proof that
> no further changes to the API are needed. Once we get to that point,
> we can pull it out of oslo-incubator and replace imports in projects
> depending on it.
>
> I can take care of that as soon as Ith development starts, unless
> there's another volunteer :D.


+1, that sounds like a good approach.

Doug


>
>
> Cheers,
> FF
>
> --
> @flaper87
> Flavio Percoco
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.**org <OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**openstack-dev<http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130924/6c2490df/attachment.html>