Open Stack

I respect the desires of packagers to have a stable environment, but I'm
also very sad about having to copy the OrderedDict code directly into
Glance. Can we actually verify that this is a problem for packagers? (I.e.
not already in their repos?)

It also may be possible that packagers who do not support python2.6 could
completely avoid this problem if we change how the code is written. Does it
seem possible to only depend on ordereddict if collections.ordereddict does
not exist?


On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Dolph Mathews <dolph.mathews at gmail.com>wrote:

>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Paul Bourke <pauldbourke at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've submitted https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46474/ to add
>> ordereddict to openstack/requirements.
>>
>>
> Related thread:
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015121.html
>
>
>> The reasoning behind the change is that we want ConfigParser to store
>> sections in the order they're read, which is the default behavior in
>> py2.7[1], but it must be specified in py2.6.
>>
>> The following two Glance features depend on this:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46268/
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46283/
>>
>> Can someone take a look at this change?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Paul
>>
>> [1]
>> http://docs.python.org/2/library/configparser.html#ConfigParser.RawConfigParser
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> -Dolph
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130919/d890f02f/attachment.html>