Open Stack

Hi,
I think that it has been a valuable learning experience and hopefully
we'll be able to close the gaps regarding the API in I. Thanks for all of
the reviews and inputs.
Thanks
Gary

On 9/6/13 10:57 PM, "Debojyoti Dutta" <ddutta at gmail.com> wrote:

>+1 Gary
>
>If this was allowed in H2 and not stopped due to the mandatory
>requirement to use API objects (then), this feature would have
>definitely seen the light of day (and we would have improved it to use
>the objects/v3api anyway). This API leads to a bunch of new features
>that make Openstack even better in terms of resource allocation,
>scheduling, policies etc. Hence a little sad.
>
>Hopefully we will have better luck next time :) Thanks to all the
>reviewers esp Chris Yeoh, Dan Smith, Alex Xu and Russell Bryant for
>their time. Thanks Thierry for trying to help with the FFE!
>
>debo
>
>On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Gary Kotton <gkotton at vmware.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/6/13 5:07 PM, "Russell Bryant" <rbryant at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 09/06/2013 05:06 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>>>> Debojyoti Dutta wrote:
>>>>> As per my IRC chats with dansmith, russellb, this feature needs the
>>>>> user auth checks (being taken care of in
>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1221396).
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan has some more comments ....
>>>>>
>>>>> Could we please do a FFE for this one .... has been waiting for a
>>>>>long
>>>>> time and we have done all that we were asked relatively quickly ....
>>>>> in H2 it was gated by API object refactor. Most of the current
>>>>> comments (pre last one by Dan) are due to
>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1221396
>>>>
>>>> This sounds relatively self-contained and ready. If you can get it
>>>> merged (with the additional bugfix) before the release meeting
>>>>Tuesday,
>>>> personally I'm fine with it.
>>>>
>>>
>>>I originally was fine with a FFE for this.  However, after some
>>>discussion yesterday, it seems there are quite a few comments on the
>>>review.  There's more iterating to do on this, so I don't have a high
>>>confidence that we can merge it in time.
>>>
>>>I would hate to grant the FFE, have you work super hard to iterate on
>>>this quickly, and it still not make it in time.  I think at this point
>>>we should just defer to Icehouse to ensure that there is proper time to
>>>do the updates and get good review on them.
>>
>> I am a little sad that this not been granted an FFE. We worked really
>>hard
>> on this. To be honest it was ready for review at the end of H2. I guess
>> that our goal will now be to get this valuable feature in beginning of
>>the
>> Icehouse release.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Gary
>>
>>>
>>>NACK on the FFE.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>--
>>>Russell Bryant
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>-- 
>-Debo~
>
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev