Open Stack

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob Ball" <bob.ball at citrix.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>, "Mark McLoughlin" <markmc at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Dan Prince (dprince at redhat.com)" <dprince at redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 6, 2013 10:21:45 AM
> Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE Request: oslo-messaging
> 
> Puppet is failing to build the packages - which is probably understandable
> given it's a refactor.
> 
> I'm not sure if this is something that points to a problem with the refactor
> or the packaging itself - hopefully Dan can review the logs, or if others
> want to see more of the details look at the logs at
> https://review.openstack.org/39929.
> 
> I don't see any point in triggering another Smokestack run as it's likely to
> fail again until the packaging issue has been resolved by Dan's team.

FTR. SmokeStack should have oslo-messaging packages available for use as of today. Once I kick the tires on it a bit I'll go and re-run the existing Nova Oslo messaging branches so we have a better idea of how this works w/ Qpid, etc.

So whether we wait till IceHouse or not we'll be ready.

Dan

> 
> Bob
> 
> From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum at gmail.com]
> Sent: 05 September 2013 17:04
> To: Mark McLoughlin; OpenStack Development Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE Request: oslo-messaging
> 
> Thanks Mark. Looks like we need to get someone to manually trigger Smokestack
> to run against this review at least once since i don't see any +1's from
> Smokestack for some reason.
> 
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Mark McLoughlin
> <markmc at redhat.com<mailto:markmc at redhat.com>> wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 10:43 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > Mark,
> >
> > Has this changeset get through a full tempest with QPid enabled?
> No, I've only done local testing with the qpid transport to date.
> 
> I think Smokestack is the only CI tool actively testing the qpid driver.
> I ran out of time adding oslo.messaging to Smokestack before heading off
> on vacation, but I expect I'll get to it next week.
> 
> Cheers,
> Mark.
> 
> 
> >
> > thanks,
> > dims
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Mark McLoughlin
> > <markmc at redhat.com<mailto:markmc at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for the final (and
> > > admittedly the largest) patch in the series of 40 patches to port Nova to
> > > oslo.messaging:
> > >
> > >   https://review.openstack.org/39929
> > >
> > > While this change doesn't provide any immediate user-visible benefit, it
> > > would be massively helpful in maintaining momentum behind the effort all
> > > through the Havana cycle to move the RPC code from oslo-incubator into a
> > > library.
> > >
> > > In terms of risk of regression, there is certainly some risk but that
> > > risk
> > > is mitigated by the fact that the core code of each of the transport
> > > drivers has been modified minimally. The idea was to delay re-factoring
> > > these drivers until we were sure that we hadn't caused any regressions in
> > > Nova. The code has been happily passing the devstack/tempest based
> > > integration tests for 10 days now.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mark.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>