[openstack-dev] [nova] Revert Baremetal v3 API extension?

Alex Xu xuhj at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Sep 5 10:47:01 UTC 2013


+1
On 2013年09月05日 17:51, John Garbutt wrote:
> +1 I meant to raise that myself when I saw some changes there the other day.
>
> On 4 September 2013 15:52, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:
>> Russell Bryant wrote:
>>> On 09/04/2013 10:26 AM, Dan Smith wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> As someone who has felt about as much pain as possible from the
>>>> dual-maintenance of the v2 and v3 API extensions, I felt compelled to
>>>> bring up one that I think we can drop. The baremetal extension was
>>>> ported to v3 API before (I think) the decision was made to make v3
>>>> experimental for Havana. There are a couple of patches up for review
>>>> right now that make obligatory changes to one or both of the versions,
>>>> which is what made me think about this.
>>>>
>>>> Since Ironic is on the horizon and was originally slated to deprecate
>>>> the in-nova-tree baremetal support for Havana, and since v3 is only
>>>> experimental in Havana, I think we can drop the baremetal extension for
>>>> the v3 API for now. If Nova's baremetal support isn't ready for
>>>> deprecation by the time we're ready to promote the v3 API, we can
>>>> re-introduce it at that time. Until then, I propose we avoid carrying
>>>> it for a soon-to-be-deprecated feature.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>> Sounds reasonable to me.  Anyone else have a differing opinion about it?
>> +1
>>
>> --
>> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list