[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Wait a minute... I thought we were going to remove Alembic until Icehouse-1?
Jay Pipes
jaypipes at gmail.com
Wed Sep 4 04:20:06 UTC 2013
So I went to do the work I said I was going to do at last week's
Ceilometer meeting -- translate the 2 Alembic migrations in the
Ceilometer source into SA-migrate migrations -- and then rebased my
branch only to find 2 more Alembic migrations added in the last few days:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/42716/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/42715/
I will note that there is no unit testing of either of these migrations,
because neither of them runs on SQLite, which is what the unit tests use
(improperly, IMHO). There is a unique constraint name in one of them
(only apparently used in the PostgreSQL driver) that is inconsistent
with the naming of unique constraints that is used in the other
migration. Note that I am not in favor of the unique constraint naming
convention of table_columnA0columnB0columnC0, as I've noted in the
upstream oslo.db patch that adds a linter-style check for this convention:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/42307/
I thought we were going to translate the existing 2 Alembic migrations
to SA-migrate migrations, and then do a switch to Alembic (removing the
old SA-migrate versioning) in Icehouse-1? This was supposed to get us
past the current mess of having both SA-migrate and Alembic migrations
in the same source code base -- which is confusing a bunch of
contributors who have written SA-migrate migrations.
Can we have a decision on this please?
I thought the plan from last week was:
1) Translate the 2 Alembic migrations to SA-Migrate migrations
2) Remove Alembic support from Ceilometer
3) Add unit tests (pretty much as-is from Glance) that would test the
SA-migrate migrations in the unit tests as well as the MySQL and
PostgreSQL testers in the gate
4) Add SA-migrate migrations for the remainder of Havana
5) Immediately after the cut of Havana final, do a cutover to Alembic
from SA-migrate that would:
a) Create an initial Alembic migration that would be the schema state
of the Ceilometer database at the last cut of Havana
b) Write a simple check for the migrate_version table in the database
to check if the database was under SA-migrate control. If so, do nothing
other than remove the migrate_version table
c) Remove all the ceilometer/storage/sqlalchemy/migrate_repo/*
Thanks,
-jay
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list