Hi Erik and Li. Unconference at the next summit? On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:34:28PM -0700, beyounn <beyounn at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Erik, > > While we were discussing about the service VM framework, the trunk port > support was also mentioned. I think people do see the needs for it. > > I have seen someone have mentioned another BP > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/quantum-network-bundle-api in > your BP already. Maybe it is same as what you are doing. > > And the trunk port use case can also impact how the zone being constructed > in the fwaas context (when a firewall VM uses a trunk port to connect > multiple networks). The basic question is how we should present a trunk port > and the vlan on a trunk port to Neutron. > > > > Yi > > > > From: Erik Moe [mailto:emoe264 at gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 1:56 PM > To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] VLAN aware VMs > > > > Hi! > > We are looking into how to make it possible for tenant VMs to use VLAN > tagged traffic to connect to different Neutron networks. > > > > The VID on frames sent/received will determine which Neutron network the > frames are connected to. > > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/vlan-aware-vms > > I would like to find others that also see the need for this kind of > functionality and would like to discuss this. > > Regards, > Erik > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata at gmail.com>