Open Stack

On 10/24/13 at 11:07am, Russell Bryant wrote:
>On 10/24/2013 10:52 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/24/13 4:46 PM, "Dan Smith" <dms at danplanet.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> In the last meeting we discussed an idea that I think is worth trying at
>>>> least for icehouse-1 to see if we like it or not.  The idea is that
>>>> *every* blueprint starts out at a Low priority, which means "best
>>>> effort, but no promises".  For a blueprint to get prioritized higher, it
>>>> should have 2 nova-core members signed up to review the resulting code.
>>>
>>> Huge +1 to this. I'm in favor of the whole plan, but specifically the
>>> prioritization piece is very important, IMHO.
>>
>> I too am in favor of the idea. It is just not clear how 2 Nova cores will
>> be signed up.
>
>Good point, there was no detail on that.  I propose just comments on the
>blueprint whiteboard.  It can be something simple like this to indicate
>that Dan and I have agreed to review the code for something:
>
>    "nova-core reviewers: russellb, dansmith"

+1 to everything in Russells original email.  But for this point 
specifically I see it as resulting from conversations amongst Nova 
developers.  If some of us decide that a blueprint is important or very 
nice to have then we should sign up to help it through.  But there's 
nothing wrong with a low priority blueprint.  We may want to communicate 
that core members don't need to be hunted and recruited for absolutely 
every blueprint that's proposed.

>
>-- 
>Russell Bryant
>
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev