[openstack-dev] Havana neutron security groups config issue
Leandro Reox
leandro.reox at gmail.com
Fri Oct 18 20:14:28 UTC 2013
Aaaron, i fixed the config issues moving the neutron opts up to the default
section. But now im having this issue
i can launch intances normally, it seems that the rules are not getting
applied anywhere, i have full access to the docker containers. If i do
iptable -t nat -L and iptables -L , no rules seems to be applied to any flow
I see the calls on the nova-api normally ... , but no rule applied
2013-10-18 16:10:09.873 31548 DEBUG neutronclient.client [-] RESP:{'date':
'Fri, 18 Oct 2013 20:10:07 GMT', 'status': '200', 'content-length': '2331',
'content-type': 'application/json; charset=UTF-8', 'content-location': '
http://172.16.124.16:9696/v2.0/security-groups.json'} {"security_groups":
[{"tenant_id": "df26f374a7a84eddb06881c669ffd62f", "name": "default",
"description": "default", "security_group_rules": [{"remote_group_id":
null, "direction": "egress", "remote_ip_prefix": null, "protocol": null,
"ethertype": "IPv4", "tenant_id": "df26f374a7a84eddb06881c669ffd62f",
"port_range_max": null, "port_range_min": null, "id":
"131f26d3-6b7b-47ef-9abf-fd664e59a972", "security_group_id":
"2391ac97-447e-45b7-97f2-cd8fbcafb0cb"}, {"remote_group_id": null,
"direction": "egress", "remote_ip_prefix": null, "protocol": null,
"ethertype": "IPv6", "tenant_id": "df26f374a7a84eddb06881c669ffd62f",
"port_range_max": null, "port_range_min": null, "id":
"93a8882b-adcd-489a-89e4-694f59555555", "security_group_id":
"2391ac97-447e-45b7-97f2-cd8fbcafb0cb"}, {"remote_group_id":
"2391ac97-447e-45b7-97f2-cd8fbcafb0cb", "direction": "ingress",
"remote_ip_prefix": null, "protocol": null, "ethertype": "IPv4",
"tenant_id": "df26f374a7a84eddb06881c669ffd62f", "port_range_max": null,
"port_range_min": null, "id": "fb15316c-efd0-4a70-ae98-23f260f0d76d",
"security_group_id": "2391ac97-447e-45b7-97f2-cd8fbcafb0cb"},
{"remote_group_id": "2391ac97-447e-45b7-97f2-cd8fbcafb0cb", "direction":
"ingress", "remote_ip_prefix": null, "protocol": null, "ethertype": "IPv6",
"tenant_id": "df26f374a7a84eddb06881c669ffd62f", "port_range_max": null,
"port_range_min": null, "id": "fc524bb9-b015-42b0-bdab-cd64db2763a6",
"security_group_id": "2391ac97-447e-45b7-97f2-cd8fbcafb0cb"}], "id":
"2391ac97-447e-45b7-97f2-cd8fbcafb0cb"}, {"tenant_id":
"df26f374a7a84eddb06881c669ffd62f", "name": "culo", "description": "",
"security_group_rules": [{"remote_group_id": null, "direction": "egress",
"remote_ip_prefix": null, "protocol": null, "ethertype": "IPv6",
"tenant_id": "df26f374a7a84eddb06881c669ffd62f", "port_range_max": null,
"port_range_min": null, "id": "2c23f70a-691b-4601-87a0-2ec092488746",
"security_group_id": "fe569b17-d6e0-4b1e-bae3-1132e748190c"},
{"remote_group_id": null, "direction": "egress", "remote_ip_prefix": null,
"protocol": null, "ethertype": "IPv4", "tenant_id":
"df26f374a7a84eddb06881c669ffd62f", "port_range_max": null,
"port_range_min": null, "id": "7a445e16-81c1-45c1-8efd-39ce3bcd9ca6",
"security_group_id": "fe569b17-d6e0-4b1e-bae3-1132e748190c"}], "id":
"fe569b17-d6e0-4b1e-bae3-1132e748190c"}]}
http_log_resp
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/neutronclient/common/utils.py:179
2013-10-18 16:10:09.959 31548 INFO nova.osapi_compute.wsgi.server
[req-87c41dc0-d90a-47b9-bfa8-bd7921a26609 223f36a9e1fc44659ac93479cb508902
df26f374a7a84eddb06881c669ffd62f] 172.16.124.10 "GET
/v2/df26f374a7a84eddb06881c669ffd62f/servers/detail HTTP/1.1" status: 200
len: 1878 time: 0.6089120
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Aaron Rosen <arosen at nicira.com> wrote:
> Do you have [default] at the top of your nova.conf? Could you pastebin
> your nova.conf for us to see.
> On Oct 18, 2013 12:31 PM, "Leandro Reox" <leandro.reox at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes it is, but i found that is not reading the parameter from the
>> nova.conf , i forced on the code on /network/manager.py and took the
>> argument finally but stacks cause says that the neutron_url and if i fix it
>> it stacks on the next neutron parameter like timeout :
>>
>> File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/oslo/config/cfg.py", line
>> 1648, in __getattr__
>> 2013-10-18 15:21:04.397 30931 TRACE nova.api.openstack raise
>> NoSuchOptError(name)
>> 2013-10-18 15:21:04.397 30931 TRACE nova.api.openstack NoSuchOptError: no
>> such option: neutron_url
>>
>> and then
>>
>> File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/oslo/config/cfg.py", line
>> 1648, in __getattr__
>> 2013-10-18 15:25:20.811 31305 TRACE nova.api.openstack raise
>> NoSuchOptError(name)
>> 2013-10-18 15:25:20.811 31305 TRACE nova.api.openstack NoSuchOptError: no
>> such option: neutron_url_timeout
>>
>> Its really weird, like its not reading the nova.conf neutron parameter at
>> all ...
>>
>> If i hardcode all the settings on the neutronv2/init.py .. at least it
>> works, and bring all the secgroup details from netruon
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Aaron Rosen <arosen at nicira.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Leandro,
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't believe the setting of: security_group_api=neutron in
>>> nova.conf actually doesn't matter at all on the compute nodes (still good
>>> to set it though). But it matters on the nova-api node. can you confirm
>>> that your nova-api node has: security_group_api=neutron in it's nova.conf?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Aaron
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Leandro Reox <leandro.reox at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> Im struggling with centralized sec groups on nova, were using OVS, it
>>>> seems like no matter what flag i change on nova conf, the node still
>>>> searchs the segroups on nova region local db
>>>>
>>>> We added :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [compute node]
>>>>
>>>> *nova.conf*
>>>>
>>>> firewall_driver=neutron.agent.firewall.NoopFirewallDriver
>>>> security_group_api=neutron
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *ovs_neutron_plugin.ini*
>>>>
>>>> [securitygroup]
>>>> firewall_driver =
>>>> neutron.agent.linux.iptables_firewall.OVSHybridIptablesFirewallDriver
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Restarted the agent, nova-compute services ... still the same, are we
>>>> missing something ?
>>>>
>>>> NOTE: we're using dockerIO as virt system
>>>>
>>>> Best
>>>> Leitan
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131018/5464e8a8/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list