Open Stack

I think everyone will have opinions :). I suggest proving it in
keystone and then bringing in a larger audience; we've had discussions
about graceful evolution for some time now but little concrete action
- I think because we're too ambitious, and the costs that result are
perceived to be too high.

+1 for doing it!

-Rob

On 16 October 2013 14:00, Morgan Fainberg <m at metacloud.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Doug Hellmann <doug.hellmann at dreamhost.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Making updates easier would be nice, and the abstract base class work
>> should help with that. On the other hand, as a deployer who has had to
>> rewrite our custom integration a few times in the past 6 months or so, I
>> would also welcome some stability in the plugin APIs. I understand the need
>> to provide flexibility and updated features for new REST APIs, but I hope we
>> can find a way to migrate more smoothly or make newer features optional in
>> the plugins themselves.
>>
> Agreed, the ABC changes that are slowing making their way in will most
> assuredly help some.
>
>>
>> DreamHost will have several developers at the summit; is there a session
>> to talk about approaches for this that we should make sure to attend?
>>
> I do not believe there is currently a session slated for anything like this.
> You could propose a session for this (or I could); obviously we would need
> enough interest to make it worth committing a whole session to.  Maybe
> piggy-back this one onto another session already proposed?  Maybe this
> should be a broader-than-keystone-only topic?
> --Morgan
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hp.com>
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud