[openstack-dev] [Hyper-V] Havana status

Russell Bryant rbryant at redhat.com
Fri Oct 11 14:17:44 UTC 2013


On 10/11/2013 09:02 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
> OpenStack is organized differently: there are lots of separate projects (Nova, Neutrom, Glance, etc) instead of a single one (which is a good thing), but I believe that a similar approach can be applied. Specific contributors can be nominated "core rewievers" on specific directories in the tree only and that would scale immediately the core review bandwidth. 
> 
> As a practical example for Nova: in our case that would simply include the following subtrees: "nova/virt/hyperv" and "nova/tests/virt/hyperv". Other projects didn't hit the review bandwidth limits yet as heavily as Nova did, but the same concept could be applied everywhere. 

If maintainers of a particular driver would prefer this sort of
autonomy, I'd rather look at creating new repositories.  I'm completely
open to going that route on a per-driver basis.  Thoughts?

For the main tree, I think we already do something like this in
practice.  Core reviewers look for feedback (+1/-1) from experts of that
code and take it heavily into account when doing the review.

-- 
Russell Bryant



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list