[openstack-dev] [Hyper-V] Havana status
Russell Bryant
rbryant at redhat.com
Fri Oct 11 14:17:44 UTC 2013
On 10/11/2013 09:02 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
> OpenStack is organized differently: there are lots of separate projects (Nova, Neutrom, Glance, etc) instead of a single one (which is a good thing), but I believe that a similar approach can be applied. Specific contributors can be nominated "core rewievers" on specific directories in the tree only and that would scale immediately the core review bandwidth.
>
> As a practical example for Nova: in our case that would simply include the following subtrees: "nova/virt/hyperv" and "nova/tests/virt/hyperv". Other projects didn't hit the review bandwidth limits yet as heavily as Nova did, but the same concept could be applied everywhere.
If maintainers of a particular driver would prefer this sort of
autonomy, I'd rather look at creating new repositories. I'm completely
open to going that route on a per-driver basis. Thoughts?
For the main tree, I think we already do something like this in
practice. Core reviewers look for feedback (+1/-1) from experts of that
code and take it heavily into account when doing the review.
--
Russell Bryant
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list