Open Stack

+1. Thanks Monty, very good clarification and suggestion!


2013/10/9 Nachi Ueno <nachi at ntti3.com>

> +1
>
> 2013/10/8 Monty Taylor <mordred at inaugust.com>:
> > Hey!
> >
> > Got a question on IRC which seemed fair game for a quick mailing list
> post:
> >
> > Q: I see both addCleanup and tearDown in nova's test suite - which one
> > should I use for new code?
> >
> > A: addCleanup
> >
> > All new code should 100% of the time use addCleanup and not tearDown -
> > this is because addCleanups are all guaranteed to run, even if one of
> > them fails, whereas a failure inside of a tearDown can leave the rest of
> > the tearDown un-executed, which can leave stale state laying around.
> >
> > Eventually, as we get to it, tearDown should be 100% erradicated from
> > OpenStack. However, we don't really need more patch churn, so I
> > recommend only working on it as you happen to be in related code.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Monty
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
*--------------------------------------------*
*Lingxian Kong*
Huawei Technologies Co.,LTD.
IT Product Line CloudOS PDU
China, Xi'an
Mobile: +86-18602962792
Email: konglingxian at huawei.com; anlin.kong at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131010/68176084/attachment.html>