[openstack-dev] Blueprint for IPAM and Policy extensions in Neutron
Nachi Ueno
nachi at ntti3.com
Tue Oct 8 17:42:10 UTC 2013
Hi Rudra
Thanks!
Some questions and comments
- name and fq_name
How we use name and fq_name ?
IMO, we should prevent to use shorten name.
- "src_ports": ["80-80"],
For API consistency, we should use similar way of the security groups
http://docs.openstack.org/api/openstack-network/2.0/content/POST_createSecGroupRule__security-group-rules_security-groups-ext.html
- PolicyRuleCreate
Could you add more example if the action contains services.
"action_list": ["simple_action-pass"],
This spec is related with service framework discussion also.
so I wanna know the detail and different with service framework.
it is also helpful if we could have full list of examples.
Best
Nachi
2013/10/7 Rudra Rugge <rrugge at juniper.net>:
> Hi Nachi,
>
> I have split the spec for policy and VPN wiki served as a good reference point. Please review and provide comments:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprint-policy-extensions-for-neutron
>
> Thanks,
> Rudra
>
> On Oct 4, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Nachi Ueno <nachi at ntti3.com> wrote:
>
>> 2013/10/4 Rudra Rugge <rrugge at juniper.net>:
>>> Hi Nachi,
>>>
>>> Inline response
>>>
>>> On 10/4/13 12:54 PM, "Nachi Ueno" <nachi at ntti3.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Rudra
>>>>
>>>> inline responded
>>>>
>>>> 2013/10/4 Rudra Rugge <rrugge at juniper.net>:
>>>>> Hi Nachi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for reviewing the BP. Please see inline:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/4/13 11:30 AM, "Nachi Ueno" <nachi at ntti3.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Rudra
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Two comment from me
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (1) IPAM and Network policy extension looks like independent extension.
>>>>>> so IPAM part and Network policy should be divided for two blueprints.
>>>>>
>>>>> [Rudra] I agree that these need to be split into two blueprints. I will
>>>>> create another BP.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (2) The team IPAM is too general word. IMO we should use more specific
>>>>>> word.
>>>>>> How about SubnetGroup?
>>>>>
>>>>> [Rudra] IPAM holds more information.
>>>>> - All DHCP attributes for this IPAM subnet
>>>>> - DNS server configuration
>>>>> - In future address allocation schemes
>>>>
>>>> Actually, Neutron Subnet has dhcp, DNS, ip allocation schemes.
>>>> If I understand your proposal correct, IPAM is a group of subnets
>>>> for of which shares common parameters.
>>>> Also, you can propose to extend existing subnet.
>>>
>>> [Rudra] Neutron subnet requires a network as I understand. IPAM info
>>> should not have such dependency. Similar to Amazon VPC model where all
>>> IPAM information can be stored even if a a network is not created.
>>> Association to networks can happen at a later time.
>>
>> OK I got it. However IPAM is still too general word.
>> Don't you have any alternatives?
>>
>> Best
>> Nachi
>>
>>> Rudra
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (3) Network Policy Resource
>>>>>> I would like to know more details of this api
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to know resource definition and
>>>>>> sample API request and response json.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (This is one example
>>>>>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Quantum/VPNaaS )
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Especially, I'm interested in src-addresses, dst-addresses, action-list
>>>>>> properties.
>>>>>> Also, how can we express any port in your API?
>>>>>
>>>>> [Rudra] Will add the details of the resources and APIs after separating
>>>>> the blueprint.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Best
>>>> Nachi
>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Rudra
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best
>>>>>> Nachi
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2013/10/4 Rudra Rugge <rrugge at juniper.net>:
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The link in the email was incorrect. Please follow the following link:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ipam-policy-extensions-f
>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>> -neutron
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Rudra
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 3, 2013, at 11:38 AM, Rudra Rugge <rrugge at juniper.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A blueprint has been registered to add IPAM and Policy
>>>>>>> extensions to Neutron. Please review the blueprint and
>>>>>>> the attached specification.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/juniper-contrail-ipam-po
>>>>>>> li
>>>>>>> cy-extensions-for-neutron
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All comments are welcome.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Rudra
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list