Open Stack

Hi, like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
with -core responsibilities.

Please see Russell's excellent stats:
http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-30.txt
http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-90.txt

For joining and retaining core I look at the 90 day statistics; folk
who are particularly low in the 30 day stats get a heads up: it's not
a purely mechanical process :).

As we've just merged review teams with Tuskar devs, we need to allow
some time for everyone to get up to speed; so for folk who are core as
a result of the merge will be retained as core, but November I expect
the stats will have normalised somewhat and that special handling
won't be needed.

IMO these are the reviewers doing enough over 90 days to meet the
requirements for core:

|       lifeless **        |     349    8 140   2 199    57.6% |    2
(  1.0%)  |
|     clint-fewbar **      |     329    2  54   1 272    83.0% |    7
(  2.6%)  |
|         cmsj **          |     248    1  25   1 221    89.5% |   13
(  5.9%)  |
|        derekh **         |      88    0  28  23  37    68.2% |    6
( 10.0%)  |

Who are already core, so thats easy.

If you are core, and not on that list, that may be because you're
coming from tuskar, which doesn't have 90 days of history, or you need
to get stuck into some more reviews :).

Now, 30 day history - this is the heads up for folk:

| clint-fewbar **  |     179    2  27   0 150    83.8% |    6 (  4.0%)  |
|     cmsj **      |     179    1  15   0 163    91.1% |   11 (  6.7%)  |
|   lifeless **    |     129    3  39   2  85    67.4% |    2 (  2.3%)  |
|    derekh **     |      41    0  11   0  30    73.2% |    0 (  0.0%)  |
|      slagle      |      37    0  11  26   0    70.3% |    3 ( 11.5%)  |
|    ghe.rivero    |      28    0   4  24   0    85.7% |    2 (  8.3%)  |


I'm using the fairly simple metric of 'average at least one review a
day' as a proxy for 'sees enough of the code and enough discussion of
the code to be an effective reviewer'. James and Ghe, good stuff -
you're well on your way to core. If you're not in that list, please
treat this as a heads-up that you need to do more reviews to keep on
top of what's going on, whether so you become core, or you keep it.

In next month's update I'll review whether to remove some folk that
aren't keeping on top of things, as it won't be a surprise :).

Cheers,
Rob






-- 
Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hp.com>
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud