Open Stack

On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:00 AM, Nicholas Chase wrote:

> 
> 
> On 10/1/2013 10:53 AM, Michael Basnight wrote:
> 
>> Well this sucks. Im not sure im a fan of renaming it because of the previous existence of a package. Renaming is not fun. Ill let the more experienced openstack peoples help decide on this...
> 
> Certainly it's not fun, but wouldn't it be easier to do it NOW, rather than later?

Hah, well, it begs the question, why are we _not_ namespacing all openstack packages. If you look @ the rpms, they are all namespaced [1]. IMHO, i wouldnt mind seeing openstack-blah packages. And let me reiterate, im not sure changing our name _again_ is the way to go because of a conflicting debian package. This wont be a problem for the rpms, because they are namespaced (openstack-trove).

[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/openstack-nova
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131001/afec45b3/attachment.pgp>