[openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition
David Chadwick
d.w.chadwick at kent.ac.uk
Fri Nov 29 20:19:18 UTC 2013
Hi Arvind
I have added my two-penneth to the latest version.
I look forward to your comments
regards
David
On 26/11/2013 23:07, Tiwari, Arvind wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for your time and valuable comments. I have replied to your comments and try to explain why I am advocating to this BP.
>
> Let me know your thoughts, please feel free to update below etherpad
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition
>
> Thanks again,
> Arvind
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Chadwick [mailto:d.w.chadwick at kent.ac.uk]
> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 12:12 PM
> To: Tiwari, Arvind; OpenStack Development Mailing List
> Cc: Henry Nash; ayoung at redhat.com; dolph.mathews at gmail.com; Yee, Guang
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition
>
> Hi Arvind
>
> I have just added some comments to your blueprint page
>
> regards
>
> David
>
>
> On 19/11/2013 00:01, Tiwari, Arvind wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Based on our discussion in design summit , I have redone the service_id
>> binding with roles BP
>> <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/serviceid-binding-with-role-definition>.
>> I have added a new BP (link below) along with detailed use case to
>> support this BP.
>>
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/service-scoped-role-definition
>>
>> Below etherpad link has some proposals for Role REST representation and
>> pros and cons analysis
>>
>>
>>
>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition
>>
>>
>>
>> Please take look and let me know your thoughts.
>>
>>
>>
>> It would be awesome if we can discuss it in tomorrow's meeting.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Arvind
>>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list