Open Stack

On 26/11/13 10:57 -0600, Dolph Mathews wrote:
>
>On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Flavio Percoco <flavio at redhat.com> wrote:
>    As crazy as it sounds, have you guys considered migrating to
>    Nottingham's approach?
>
>
>
>It only sounds crazy because I have no idea how to "migrate" an unversioned
>endpoint :) Skimming through his proposal, it looks like it might actually be
>compatible with ours to include side by side? If so, we could support both for
>a couple releases before moving on.

This would be awesome. We'll still have to write a python library for
it but that's something we could do as part of Marconi's client
development and then move it to its own repo - or oslo - once it's
ready.

>Does this proposal have much traction outside the OpenStack community? (and how
>much traction does it have within the community already?)

It does. I don't have the exact numbers of users but I know for sure
the work there is moving forward. A new version will be released soon,
AFAIU.

Cheers,
FF

-- 
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131128/70776af4/attachment.pgp>