[openstack-dev] [Solum] [Security]
Adrian Otto
adrian.otto at rackspace.com
Thu Nov 28 03:06:39 UTC 2013
On Nov 27, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Nathan Kinder <nkinder at redhat.com>
wrote:
> On 11/27/2013 08:58 AM, Paul Montgomery wrote:
>> I created some relatively high level security best practices that I
>> thought would apply to Solum. I don't think it is ever too early to get
>> mindshare around security so that developers keep that in mind throughout
>> the project. When a design decision point could easily go two ways,
>> perhaps these guidelines can sway direction towards a more secure path.
>>
>> This is a living document, please contribute and let's discuss topics.
>> I've worn a security hat in various jobs so I'm always interested. :)
>> Also, I realize that many of these features may not directly be
>> encapsulated by Solum but rather components such as KeyStone or Horizon.
>>
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/Security
>
> This is a great start.
>
> I think we really need to work towards a set of overarching security
> guidelines and best practices that can be applied to all of the
> projects. I know that each project may have unique security needs, but
> it would be really great to have a central set of agreed upon
> cross-project guidelines that a developer can follow.
>
> This is a goal that we have in the OpenStack Security Group. I am happy
> to work on coordinating this. For defining these guidelines, I think a
> "working group" approach might be best, where we have an interested
> representative from each project be involved. Does this approach make
> sense to others?
Nathan, that sounds great. I'd like Paul Montgomery to be involved for Solum, and possibly others from Solum if we have volunteers with this skill set to join him.
>
> Thanks,
> -NGK
>
>>
>> I would like to build on this list and create blueprints or tasks based on
>> topics that the community agrees upon. We will also need to start
>> thinking about timing of these features.
>>
>> Is there an OpenStack standard for code comments that highlight potential
>> security issues to investigate at a later point? If not, what would the
>> community think of making a standard for Solum? I would like to identify
>> these areas early while the developer is still engaged/thinking about the
>> code. It is always harder to go back later and find everything in my
>> experience. Perhaps something like:
>>
>> # (SECURITY) This exception may contain database field data which could
>> expose passwords to end users unless filtered.
>>
>> Or
>>
>> # (SECURITY) The admin password is read in plain text from a configuration
>> file. We should fix this later.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Paulmo
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list