[openstack-dev] [Nova] Blueprint: standard specification of guest CPU topology
Wangpan
hzwangpan at corp.netease.com
Wed Nov 20 03:18:24 UTC 2013
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for your help in advance.
I have read your wiki page and it explains this issue very clearly.
But I have a question about the 'technical design', you give us a prototype method as below:
def get_guest_cpu_topology(self, inst_type, image, preferred_topology, mandatory_topology):
my question is that, how/where we can get these two parameters 'preferred_topology, mandatory_topology'?
from the nova config file? or get from the hypervisor?
Thanks again.
2013-11-20
Wangpan
发件人:"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange at redhat.com>
发送时间:2013-11-19 20:15
主题:[openstack-dev] [Nova] Blueprint: standard specification of guest CPU topology
收件人:"openstack-dev"<openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
抄送:
For attention of maintainers of Nova virt drivers
A while back there was a bug requesting the ability to set the CPU
topology (sockets/cores/threads) for guests explicitly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1199019
I countered that setting explicit topology doesn't play well with
booting images with a variety of flavours with differing vCPU counts.
This led to the following change which used an image property to
express maximum constraints on CPU topology (max-sockets/max-cores/
max-threads) which the libvirt driver will use to figure out the
actual topology (sockets/cores/threads)
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56510/
I believe this is a prime example of something we must co-ordinate
across virt drivers to maximise happiness of our users.
There's a blueprint but I find the description rather hard to
follow
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/support-libvirt-vcpu-topology
So I've created a standalone wiki page which I hope describes the
idea more clearly
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VirtDriverGuestCPUTopology
Launchpad doesn't let me link the URL to the blueprint since I'm not
the blurprint creator :-(
Anyway this mail is to solicit input on the proposed standard way to
express this which is hypervisor portable and the addition of some
shared code for doing the calculations which virt driver impls can
just all into rather than re-inventing
I'm looking for buy-in to the idea from the maintainers of each
virt driver that this conceptual approach works for them, before
we go merging anything with the specific impl for libvirt.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131120/ab54c33a/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list