Open Stack

On Nov 19, 2013, at 7:23 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmartinsc at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> One more thing...
> 
> I'm thinking about the "use case" for "Floating IPs" in a NAT-less IPv6 OpenStack environment.
> 
> 
> I can think in two "use cases" in a IPv6-Only Tenant Subnet:
> 
> 1- the Floating IP might be used to allocate more IPv6 address for an Instance (since there is no plans for NAT66, I believe it is not desired) but, instead of allocating it from the "allocation pool", get it from the tenant subnet directly. This way, the "IPv6 Floating IP" will appear within the Instance it self, not at the L3 Namespace Router as it is with IPv4 today.
> 
> 2- we can provide a IPv4 Floating IP address (for a IPv6-Only tenant) and the L3 Namespace Router will do the NAT46. This way, the "old Internet" will be able to seamless reach a IPv6-Only network.
> 
> 
> What do you guys have in mind / roadmap?!
> 
> Cheers!
> Thiago
> 
Hi Thiago:

An IPV6 subteam in Neutron was formed for the Icehouse release. The
team will have weekly meetings in #openstack-meeting-alt on freenode
Thursday's at 2100 UTV. See the meeting page here [1]. If you're planning
to work on IPV6 in any form, it would be great to participate in these and
help shape the IPV6 direction for Neutron.

Thanks, and welcome aboard!
Kyle

[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-IPv6-Subteam

> 
> 
> On 19 November 2013 22:57, Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmartinsc at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Stackers!
> 
> I'm Thiago and I'm here on dev list mostly to watch you guys...
> 
> Nevertheless, I want to say that I would love to test in deep, the IPv6 support in OpenStack IceHouse.
> 
> At at glance, what I'm looking for is more or less specified here, as follows: