Open Stack

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Matt Riedemann
<mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com>wrote:

>
>
> On 11/14/2013 2:43 PM, David Ripton wrote:
>
>> On 11/11/2013 03:35 PM, David Ripton wrote:
>>
>>  I'll volunteer to do this release.  I'll wait 24 hours from the
>>> timestamp of this email for input first.  So, if anyone has opinions
>>> about the timing of this release, please speak up.
>>>
>>> (In particular, I'd like to do a release *before* Matt Riedermann's DB2
>>> support patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/55572/ lands, just in
>>> case it breaks anything.  Of course we could do another release shortly
>>> after it gets in, to make folks who use DB2 happy.)
>>>
>>
>> Update:
>>
>> There's now a "0.8" tag in Git but that release failed to reach PyPI, so
>> please ignore it.
>>
>> Thanks fungi and mordred for helping debug what went wrong.
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56449/ (a one-liner) should fix the
>> problem.  Once it gets approved, I will attempt to push "0.8.1".
>>
>>
> Any particular reason to go with 0.8 rather than 0.7.3 as a bug fix
> release?
>
>
As an outside observer, I had assumed that the version number was (at least
in part) indicating compatibility with the corresponding release of
sqlalchemy itself (current stable is 0.8.x).


> --
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt Riedemann
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 

-Dolph
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131114/db65db48/attachment.html>