Open Stack

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Laski [mailto:andrew.laski at rackspace.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 3:22 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][object] One question to the resource
> tracker session
> 
> On 11/13/13 at 11:12pm, Jiang, Yunhong wrote:
> >Hi, Dan Smith and all,
> >	I noticed followed statement in 'Icehouse tasks' in
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IcehouseNovaExtensibleSchedulerMetr
> ics
> >
> >		convert resource tracker to objects
> >		make resoruce tracker extensible
> >		no db migrations ever again!!
> >		extra specs to cover resources - use a name space
> >
> >	How is it planned to achieve the 'no db migrations ever again'? Even
> with the object, we still need keep resource information in database. And
> when new resource type added, we either add a new column to the table.
> Or it means we merge all resource information into a single column as json
> string and parse it in the resource tracker object?.
> 
> You're right, it's not really achievable without moving to a schemaless
> persistence model.  I'm fairly certain it was added to be humorous and
> should not be considered an outcome of that session.

Andrew, thanks for the explanation. Not sure anyone have interests on this task, otherwise I will take it.

--jyh

> 
> >
> >Thanks
> >--jyh
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev