Open Stack

+1, This is a great idea.  We could consider it as a general process for
all tests.


2013/11/14 Koderer, Marc <m.koderer at telekom.de>

> Hi all,
>
> I think we have quite the same issue with the neutron testing. I already
> put it on the agenda for the QA meeting for today.
> Let's make it to a general topic.
>
> Regards
> Marc
> ________________________________________
> From: Giulio Fidente [gfidente at redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 6:23 AM
> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Tracking development of scenario tests
>
> On 11/14/2013 12:24 AM, David Kranz wrote:
> > 1. Developer checks in the zeroth version of a scenario test as work in
> > progress. It contains a description of the test, and     possibly work
> > items.  This will "claim" the area of the proposed scenario to avoid
> > duplication and allow others to comment through gerrit.
> > 2. The developer pushes new versions, removing work in progress if the
> > code is in working state and a review is desired and/or others will be
> > contributing to the scenario.
> > 3. When finished, any process-oriented content such as progress tracking
> > is removed and the test is ready for final review.
>
> +1 , the description will eventually contribute to documenting the
> scenarios
>
> yet the submitter (step 1) remains in charge of adding to the draft the
> reviewers
>
> how about we map at least one volunteer to each service (via the HACKING
> file) and ask submitters to add such a person as reviewer of its drafts
> when the tests touch the service? this should help avoid tests duplication.
>
> I very much like the idea of using gerrit for this
> --
> Giulio Fidente
> GPG KEY: 08D733BA | IRC: giulivo
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131114/1bfa01d4/attachment.html>